This is what the Katha-Upanishad means by saying: "One path is pleasant and the other is good. The wise should choose the good" (1.2.1). It is indeed very tempting to accept the words of the one who hugs you rather then strain your head a little and try to think a little bit more. I do think that many of these "love"/"all is one" theories are based less on love and more on laziness. Truth demands hard work. To think, to read books, to successfully confront counter arguments. In a culture that sets escapism and mass-media as its ultimate goal, it is very easy to just let go of all the hard work and simply declare "all is one" and we don't need to think. In other words: laziness.
Sometimes the spiritual seeker should be harsh. Always he should insist on valid conclusions. No, it is not disrespective. On the contrary: it is the biggest respect among intellectuals. Was the Buddha disrespective when he attended public debates with counter schools? Was Shankara? Ramanuja? Madhavacharya? Patanjali? No, there is nothing wrong in following valid conclusions, and don't let anyone tell you otherwise. No, it is not a sin to tell you're guru, master or yoga instructor you see an apparent faults in his teachings and ask him to explain them. Remember the words of the Bhagavad-Gita: "Just try to learn the truth by approaching a spiritual master, serve him and inquire him submissively. One who have witnessed the Truth can show it to you" (4.34). Look carefully on this quote: "Inquire him submissively". Be submissive, be respectful, yes. Always. But also inquire. Ask him. See if he has a valid logical conclusion to each and every point.If he's for real, he will answer. And if he avoid you're question, saying you should stop thinking too much or that your just being narrow minded, well, then you no longer have to be submissive. Be alert. If you read George Orwell you should know "Knowledge is ignorance" is a slogan that can be used to control you. Serve as a disciple only if he serves as a guru.
Letting go from your mind is not freedom. It'll turn you into a slave in the hands of cheaters. The mind is not you're enemy as long as it's controlled. And controlling you're mind means making it follow valid conclusions rather then whimsical desires. And the desire to cheat and be cheated is one of the most dangerous ones. Can love not be the way? Or no-mind? I'm not saying it is and I'm not saying it isn't. But the way to finding weather they are must go through logical proof. Through the mind. Only when you see the road you should start walking in it. And you see with your eyes, not your feet.
I'm not saying that the "hugging guru" can't be true. I'm not saying that every nice guy who talks about peace and love is a cheater. He doesn't have to be. Just as long as he follows certain rules. As long as he is honest and is very strict about intellectual integrity. "Truth is God" said Gandhi. If you want to reach God, worship the truth.



